SMR 514: Joker: Folie à Deux

3 Comments

1. 

   SANDLERAGONY

   10/06/2024 at 2:33 PM

   “tough movie”, indeed. I almost missed this at my 10:30am screening & was probably better off staying in bed instead of seeing this dreck.

   I always thought the original was fine. Overrated, yet overheated with Joaquin Phoenix being the great actor he is.

   The “musical” parts are atrocious, not necessarily in effort but in pace. Everytime I heard “when the saints go marching in”, I wanted to yell at my empty theater. Just the idea of doing this in a character study, just never made any sense to me.

   Performances are fine, but you can only give such credit with a screenplay this messy.

   On the bright side, this will die a similar death just like the Snyderverse. Good riddance.

   Log in to Reply
   • 

     SANDLERAGONY

     10/06/2024 at 3:11 PM

     overhated* (damn autocorrect)

     Log in to Reply
2. 

   rodimusprime (Post author)

   10/04/2024 at 10:47 AM

   Good Morning,

   As someone who worked 10 plus years in community mental health agencies and currently works as administrator at a state run prison, large parts of the film are accurate/true. When I took completed history & physicals with patients, I often questioned the authenticity of the information. The filmmakers nailed that part.

   Something Rod didn’t consider in his review is your effective of antipsychotics. When taken consistently they create a good baseline for activities of daily living. They also come with side effects like tardive dyskinesia, altered gait, drooping eyes.

   Before working as a prison admin, I worked in the mental health ward. The abuse by the guards was over the top but accurate. I didn’t see any neglect but the officers did tell me how they “handled” mental health inmates in the 90s and early 2000s. When a person with mental health issues is imprisoned, it lessens the effectiveness of individual therapy. A therapist can attempt to utilize motivational interviewing but what does a woman on death row have to look forward to?

   The choreography in the film was very good. The costume designs are good. Harry Lawkey as a young brass Harvey Dent worked. Catherine Kenner as the defense attorney who’s hell bent on mounting a Greta defense works. When she asked the psychological expert if he read Arthur’s file, I went “Oohh I like her”. Too often people, including mental health professionals, will make decisions w/o considering all the information. Imagine the scene with Mr Puddles if she cross examined him. Watching it in IMAX and hearing commentary from background characters while the camera is on Arthur’s face was excellent and added the right amount of “is he really hearing that? Or…”

   There’s no way this film is a 1.5. In my opinion, Rod is too focused on the idea of IP authenticity and allows that cloud his objectivity.

   Trojan Scooter

   Log in to Reply